The Basic Principles Of Dianetics

I couldn't ever before not wish to get anything that enters your mind for you- if it was otherwise, I would not be resting right here with you, doing this. I not only can never have a problem, or otherwise wish to hear something that enters your mind for you, however I'm totally eager to recognize every idea, every thought, every photo or feeling that emerges or shows up for you- don't ever before believe or else, and if for some factor you do, please just allow me understand! Often, you may have an idea, and picture, concept or event turn up that does not appear to answer the inquiry, or associate to it, but however, always do inform me regarding it, and as we continue, the significance will arise for you.


This is fundamental in the basis of handling, and the subject of this conversation: the fundamental roles of the counselor and the customer: The fundamental duty of the counselor is, unlike "common training", not to control, which suggests to impose and/or hinder, but to rather work from the basis of EMPOWERING THE CLIENT.

In subjective handling, regardless of what was stated in one's training products, the cpu is not there "to regulate" the customer. As a matter of fact, the processor is there to provide the client the freedom and undistracted emphasis to process and share what materializes, and what manifests is what arises when the client addresses the product that associates with their very own goals for the handling, and for their life.

Dianetics - Truths

John Mcmasters shared this fundamental fact wonderfully well in one of his talks on Power processing, where he clarifies how he was asked what this "special flair" was that he had for giving such excellent sessions; he had to believe concerning that for a minute, and spotted that it was what he wasn't doing, along with what he was doing: he had not been assessing, evaluating, computer, or as a matter of fact, generating any kind of thoughts, not to mention verbal expressions, after providing the command and while waiting for the PC to complete their response to their satisfaction; he was, simply and only, being existing with the computer, and entirely interested.




The role of the counselor, demonstrated; that was his "special knack". I have had my own experience which taught me this well, very at an early stage in the game. In 1982, having just recently completed my training and internship on New Era Dianetics, I was running this on a COMPUTER, and there was a factor in the session where (being a little look here bit wet behind the ears not yet having lots of hours under my belt as a specialist auditor) the PC seemed to be "taking too long" to share anything vocally after I offered him a command.


This trick became the most valuable contribution that John ever before made to the topic of therapy or auditing (Dianetics). In my humble point of view, it is the best contribution that anybody has ever before made to these subjectsthe application is entirely non-judgemental, non-evaluative, and devoid of any recommendation, advice or opinion.no preconditioned program for people, or 'levels' that they must do


In Idenics, the only resource of info about a customer is the private client. In Scientology we prided ourselves on not assessing for individuals. However all that really meant was that the auditor did not vocally assess for the PC in session. The registrars and values police officers evaluated for the PC.

The Ultimate Guide To Dianetics

The Scientology Bridge is extremely evaluative and judgmentalAt find out initially, we chalked up the difference in outcomes to John's improvisational abilities and experience. Upon more investigation, details elements came to lightIt was not an issue of what he WAS doing that the other experts weren't, however instead what he WASN'T doing that they were.


Anybody that had ever before seen John audit could not assist yet discover an unique high quality in his bookkeeping."The client's fundamental role is to be there with the function of relocating the direction of their spiritual objectives, and to openly and totally reveal and experience whatever materializes for them in answering the concerns and implementing the instructions in the handling.


This is something to procedure as needed. However additionally, people often have previous experience and/or brainwashing in auditing/processing which, somehow, and to some extent, in fact misinforms them into mindsets, concepts and actions patterns that prevent the full awareness of these duties, and so they will have a tendency to prevent the expressing of what enters your mind, as in the instances given above. * The initial, and probably leading instances of mis-indoctrination leading to less than completely smooth and effective sessions, can be found in certain aspects of the training routines, or "TR's":"TR's" are often a person's first, or a minimum of early, experience in Scientology, and while I will certainly take place to clarify what I view as the imperfections in principle and technique, however, often tend to be substantially healing, done as they are offered (Hubbard firmly insists that "TR's are not navigate to this site processing, they are training", but factually, they are both handling AND training)


Alan Walter made comparable monitorings, and enhanced these with his "Existence Processes". There is no "failing", and no rejection of the truth of this being processing. The emphasis, as it must be, is on experiencing the other individual's visibility. All the symptoms which get a "fail" in doing "TR-0" are merely the being's efforts to resist the various other person's presence, and instead than being pestered and pestered with "Flunk", which imposes "failing!" on the being, one simply requires to be motivated to "stick their feet in the water a little deeper", to significantly refurbish their ability and willingness to totally share and experience "being right here", or "visibility", with others.

Facts About Dianetics Uncovered

I wait till the client looks at me as if to claim "I'm done answering, over to you, what's next?" As long as the client is looking in other places than back at the counselor, they are still processing the inquiry or command. Keep in mind "a silent auditor welcomes itsa"; the client is still refining, until their interest clearly goes back to the therapist.